← Back to J League center 中文

J League · Score Research

08-08 18:15 CST · J League · Separate HT/FT models

Hi

Hiroshima Sanfrecce

Home side / left market direction

Full-time first pick 2:1 Probability 16.6% · Standard score cluster Standard score cluster: 2:1 16.6%; 1:1 10.9%; 3:1 10.1%; 1:0 6.8% Half-time first pick 0:0 (53.5%)
JE

JEF United Ichihara Chiba

Away side / right market direction

Five-Factor Read

1. Market strength Hiroshima Sanfrecce side rates higher

The handicap leans toward Hiroshima Sanfrecce; the market prices the home side as stronger.

2. Form and pace 0:0

HT first pick is 0:0 (53.5%); HT draw probability is 58.8%, so the model still respects early caution.

3. AI Sidecar Read FT total 2.75

This match uses a DeepSeek AI sidecar factor. The AI signal only applies a small candidate-score reweighting and does not override the market/history main model by itself. AI note: 主队实力与主场优势明显,客队防守欠佳,但高温影响节奏,比分可能偏向主队小胜。阵容信息缺失。

4. Venue factor non-neutral / heat

Venue: 广岛和平之翼. Non-neutral venue. Weather/temperature: 间中有云, 34℃~35℃. The schedule marks this as non-neutral, so home/away identity remains a weak background factor. Higher temperature raises fatigue risk and late-game tempo drop risk. Together with the totals line, the venue layer can support a more open upper tail.

5. Sample and soft factors Usable sample

112 comparable matches; useful for probability ranking

Full-Time Score Distribution

2:1 16.6%
1:1 10.9%
3:1 10.1%
1:0 6.8%
3:2 6.4%
2:0 5.8%
1:2 5.7%
2:2 5.6%
FT market: side line 1.25 · total 2.75 · Bucket ah_ou:1.25/3.0
Score cluster: Standard score cluster: 2:1 16.6%; 1:1 10.9%; 3:1 10.1%; 1:0 6.8%

Half-Time Score Distribution

0:0 53.5%
1:0 23.9%
0:1 8.5%
2:0 5.2%
1:1 5.0%
2:1 1.1%
3:0 1.0%
0:2 0.7%
HT market: side line 0.50 · total 1.00
Hiroshima Sanfrecce win65.7%
Draw21.4%
JEF United Ichihara Chiba win12.9%
Hiroshima Sanfrecce expected goals2.30
JEF United Ichihara Chiba expected goals1.17
Under 3.554.9%
FT temperature0.95
Empirical weight58.3%
Sample size112
Europe 1X2home 64.4% / draw 20.9% / away 14.7%

Key Variables

First-goal path Hiroshima Sanfrecce benefits most from opening the scoring; if HT stays 0:0, the FT distribution compresses toward lower scores.
Deciding factor Draw probability is 21.4%, so the exact-score set should keep draw and one-goal-margin scripts alive.
Risk point Under 3.5 is 54.9%; if the live total moves up materially, rerun the model.

Pre-Match Update · Market Movement

Published 2026-08-25 00:37:59 CST (started/finished about 390h 23m ago) | Snapshot window: pending -> 2026-08-25 00:37:59

First snapshotFT handicap 待补 · total 待补
Latest marketFT handicap 1.25 · total 2.75

Movement: FT handicap data pending; FT total data pending; HT handicap data pending; HT total data pending.

Pre-match note: Market snapshots are thin; refresh Feijing data again before publishing the final pre-match version.

Final Read: 2:1

Predicted side: Hiroshima Sanfrecce win · Actual side: Hiroshima Sanfrecce win · side aligned

Using the full-time handicap, totals, comparable market buckets and half-time market, the model's full-time first pick for Hiroshima Sanfrecce vs JEF United Ichihara Chiba is 2:1 (16.6%). Hiroshima Sanfrecce side rates higher. This match uses a DeepSeek AI sidecar factor. The AI signal only applies a small candidate-score reweighting and does not override the market/history main model by itself. AI note: 主队实力与主场优势明显,客队防守欠佳,但高温影响节奏,比分可能偏向主队小胜。阵容信息缺失。 HT first pick is 0:0 (53.5%); HT draw probability is 58.8%, so the model still respects early caution. Exact-score outputs are probability rankings for pre-match research and review.

Risk note: exact scores are low-hit-rate events. The model output is a probability ranking, not a certainty; late market moves, lineups, red cards and early goals can reshape the distribution.

Sources

Feijing · fixtures, results, Asian handicap, totals, half-time markets, Europe 1X2 · Local history database · historical market lines, full-time scores, half-time scores · DeepSeek · AI sidecar context, bounded candidate reweighting only